Welcome, this website is intended for all international healthcare professionals in uro-oncology. By clicking the link below you are declaring and confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

You are here

Multiple repeat prostate biopsies and the detection of clinically insignificant cancer in men with large prostates

Pietzak EJ, Resnick MJ, Mucksavage P, Van Arsdalen K, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB, Guzzo TJ.

Editorial comment

Comment from Henk van der Poel:
Repeated random prostate biopsies in larger prostates have a higher risk of resulting in diagnoses of low grade cancer compared to initial biopsies in prostates smaller than 50cc. More and more men with remaining elevated PSA after negative prostate biopsies will be evaluated with MRI and PCA3. Moreover, the value of f/tPSA ratio in larger prostates may underestimate the presence of relevant disease due to dilution. More than 80% of men with more than 2 sets of biopsies and a PSA volume over 50cc had Gleason 6 adenocarcinoma. These findings indicate that in particular in larger prostates targeted biopsies may avoid unnecessary biopsies and toxicity.

Urology 2014 Aug;84(2):380-5


OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of repeating prostate biopsies on the risk of detecting clinically insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) in larger prostate glands.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using patients enrolled in our institutional PCa registry from 1991 to 2008 to assess the association of prostate volume and clinically insignificant PCa in men undergoing multiple prostate biopsies. Patients were stratified by prostate volume into 2 cohorts (<50 cm(3) or ≥50 cm(3)). Additionally, patients were stratified by prostate biopsy on which PCa was identified (1 biopsy or ≥3 biopsies).

RESULTS: Within the subgroup of patients with prostate volume ≥50 cm(3) requiring ≥3 biopsies before cancer diagnosis, 72.6% (45/62) had pathologic Gleason scores ≤6 and 81.6% (49/60) had an estimated tumor volume of ≤10% at the time of radical prostatectomy. This was significantly different from patients with prostate volume <50 cm(3) diagnosed on their first biopsy, in which only 48.5% (656/1349) were found to have Gleason scores ≤6 and 54.2% (705/1300) had estimated tumor volume ≤10% (P <.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of Gleason score upgrading at time of prostatectomy between any of the subgroups.

CONCLUSION: PCas detected in men with prostatic enlargement requiring multiple biopsies are more likely to be low-grade, low-volume tumors at final pathology than men without prostate enlargement. Men with larger prostates who have already had prior negative biopsies should be counseled regarding the increased risk of detecting clinically insignificant PCa with additional biopsies.

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.